\t\t\t\tHands Off the People of Iran unequivocally condemns the ratcheting up of sanctions on Iran in the aftermath of the much-heralded report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on that country\u2019s nuclear capability on November 8. The report did little more than confirm the assessment that Hopi arrived at some time ago: that at worst Iran may be interested in the so-called \u2018Japanese\u2019 option. This is nuclear development that stops just short of the capacity to produce a nuclear weapon – but only by a month or so. But this is something that has been commented on many times before.<\/p>\n
Despite the fact that this report contained little or nothing that was new (it was little more than a compilation of UK satellite pictures and the pre-existing reports of the CIA and other western intelligence agencies), imperialist leaders have fallen over themselves to express horror and outrage at these \u2018new\u2019 findings:<\/p>\n
Even this was not enough for the rabid Israeli regime, which frothed about Iran having a nuclear weapon within a year and made ominous noises about military action. Israel feels politically vulnerable, given the current upheavals in the Arab world. An Iran with nuclear capability challenges its regional hegemony in a broader sense, but there is also a very practical concern. Iran\u2019s missile delivery system is sophisticated enough to deliver a conventional payload to Tel Aviv – hence the November 7 explosion\/assassination at the military base in Bid Ganeh, some 20 kilometres (12 miles) west of Tehran. Amongst others this killed major-general Hassan Moqaddam, a key figure in Iran\u2019s ballistic missiles programme: according to Time<\/em> magazine, a \u201cwestern intelligence source\u201d laid the blame at the door of the Israeli spy agency, Mossad, and warned that \u201cthere are more bullets in the magazine\u201d.<\/p>\n On one level, the western powers are in a weak position when it comes to convincing the wider population that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. The debacle of Iraq – and farcical claims around Saddam\u2019s supposed \u201cweapons of mass destruction\u201d – have prompted many commentators to dub the IAEA\u2019s report \u201cIran\u2019s 45-minute moment\u201d (a reference to the nonsense peddled about Iraq\u2019s supposed capability to drop bombs on strategic European targets in that time frame). Of course, from the point of view of Iraq\u2019s barbaric rulers, if such weapons had existed it would have been a fairly obvious military response to the invasion of their country to use them. Similar claims today about Iran\u2019s nuclear ambitions will raise many a sceptical eyebrow.<\/p>\n The veracity of the report will also be called into question when it is recalled that the current IAEA director general, Yukiya Amano, has often been accused, on solid grounds, of pro-US bias. According to diplomatic cables published by Wikileaks last year, US diplomats favoured his nomination, as he was \u201cin tune with the US position regarding Iran\u2019s nuclear programme\u201d – a revelation that will help undermine the US\/Britain\u2019s charges against the regime.<\/p>\n However, on another level the case for imperialist intervention has undoubtedly been bolstered by the relatively \u2018clean\u2019 regime change in Libya (so far …). The overthrow of Gaddafi by western-backed insurgents is widely perceived of as a \u2018good war\u2019, in stark contrast to the quagmire of Iraq; the inability of the anti-war movement in this country to mobilise large numbers onto the streets in opposition to the intervention is a mark of this.<\/p>\n The current low level of anti-war mobilisation is a big problem for all those who oppose the imperialist interference in the Middle East, for we should be clear that the war on Iran has already started<\/em>. It is unlikely to take the form of military invasion and occupation at any stage – the experience of the running sore of Iraq has chastened the imperialists on that front. What we will see – are<\/em> seeing – is war pursued by other means:<\/p>\n These sorts of tactics betray the strategic goal the US and its allies have in mind. Ideally for them, a repetition – in a \u2018tidier\u2019 form – of the Libyan scenario. That is, that pressure from imperialism engenders splits in this deeply discredited regime and its possible collapse\/paralysis. Then indigenous opposition forces spearhead regime change, with the active aid and encouragement of the west. Clinton has spoken openly of her administration\u2019s hopes for the implosion of the regime. There is solid ground for her optimism. Fraught divisions exist at every level of the theocratic regime, most dramatically in its top echelons with the ongoing conflict between supreme leader ayatollah Khamenei and president Ahmadinejad, and continued joint conflict with timid reformists such as Mir-Hossein Moussavi and Mehdi Karroubi.<\/p>\n The Obama administration would have been encouraged in this by recent developments in the Iranian opposition movement. A pro-war\/anti-war-pro-sanctions debate is now dominating Iranian political discourse generally and has engendered a split into two major trends in this opposition. First there are those such as Mohammad Khatami who totally oppose the war, despite their criticisms of the regime. However, this does not flow from any sort of principled or consistently democratic position; rather, it is inspired by nationalism. Khatami has called for \u201cnational unity\u201d in the face of this crisis and offers the supreme leader advice about \u2018changing course\u2019.<\/p>\n Far more worrying has been the significant section of the opposition (including some who could be politically designated as \u2018soft left\u2019, but mainly composed of liberals) who appear to be almost egging the Americans to launch a military strike. The example of the Nato bombing of Libya is looked to by these forces as a positive example of \u2018humanitarian intervention\u2019. Although there does not appear to be the appetite in Washington for air strikes, the US\u2019s ally in the region, Israel, remains politically unstable and bellicose: witness the recent statement by Israeli defence minister Ehud Barak that \u201cWe do not expect any new UN sanctions on Tehran to persuade it to stop its nuclear defiance. We continue to recommend to our friends in the world and to ourselves not to take any option off the table.\u201d<\/p>\n The stance of Hands Off the People of Iran is crystal-clear. We implacably oppose the sabre-rattling of the imperialists and demand that all sanctions on the country are lifted, that all threats of military action be rescinded. We call for this not because we have any illusions in the loathsome regime in Iran. It starves its own people; it denies them basic human rights; it endangers their lives through its elaborate games of brinkmanship with the US and its powerful allies. Unlike some politically demented leftists, we say that nuclear weapons in its hands would be a defeat for the forces of democracy and radical social change, as well as a profoundly destabilising development in the region.<\/p>\n No, we oppose the warmongering – whether it takes the hard form of assassinations, threats of military action, or the \u2018soft\u2019 option of sanctions – because we do not have any illusions in the loathsome regimes in place in Washington, London or Tel Aviv either. The intervention of these powers and their allies has nothing whatsoever to do with the promotion of \u2018democracy\u2019 – indeed, the regimes the imperialists impose often have features that are significantly worse<\/em> than the previous team of oppressors of the people. Hopi insists that democracy can only come in Iran from below – from the struggles of the workers\u2019, women\u2019s and students\u2019 movements. It will never fall from the sky in the tip of a US or Israeli bunker-buster.<\/p>\n We look to those like the working class and anti-capitalist activists, left intellectuals and students who met in an anti-capitalist conference in Iran on November 4. Many of the contributions emphasised the need to strengthen the workers\u2019 struggles, the underground left\/workers\u2019 groups and the fight for left unity – \u201cIt is a shame that hero worship of certain intellectuals acting as semi-gods has harmed unity amongst the forces of the Iranian left,\u201d said veteran labour activist NA. Military action against Iran, whether overt or covert, whether air strikes or sanctions, only acts to disorganise and disorientate these forces for change. This is why the threatening military backdrop to the conference was discussed by participants and Clinton\u2019s bellicose statements noted. This is why Hopi contributes to their struggle for freedom by fighting against any imperialist attack on their country.<\/p>\n The imperialists want change in Iran via a palace coup or politically neutered opposition movement. Hopi says genuine democratic change must come from below, through the initiative, elan and thirst for change of the masses themselves! l<\/p>\n Hands Off the People of Iran unequivocally condemns the ratcheting up of sanctions on Iran in the aftermath of the much-heralded report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on that country\u2019s nuclear capability on November 8. The report did little more than confirm the assessment that Hopi arrived at some time ago: that at worst … <\/p>\n\n
\n